![]() I raised 280 bugs towards improving the quality of the application as a whole, and whilst I agree it's not quite there (it's not quite as 'polished' as a normal Eclipse App), it's still perfectly usable. I've been using Eclipse on Mac OS X since it came out, and I was spending my spare time as a tester for the Eclipse Mac OS X release before it became 2.1. I'm sorry Charles', but that just isn't true. It's not hard to wonder why that in a review of the four top IDEs (though, surprisingly, IntelliJ/IDEA wasn't reviewed), that Sun's Enterprise Studio came bottom of the four.īut the main reason for eschewing Charles' review of Eclipse vs NetBeans is his comments on Eclipse on Mac OS X broken. What's more interesting is that there a number of commercial spin-offs, and of those, Rational Software Architect (formerly WebSphere Studio Application Developer) are both built on top of Eclipse, Borland has become an Eclipse srategic partner, and the BEA Weblogic Studio are Eclipse-based (or Eclipse-aligned) as well. ![]() ![]() There's several different development environments: Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, JBuilder and of course NetBeans. But in the bigger world, there are a number of developers who just use it to write code. In reality, there are a number of Java IDEs out there, and each tends to have its own loyal following of developers. So take what he says with a pinch of salt at best. ![]() The guy works for Sun Microsystems, he blogs about NetBeans as if it's the best project in the world, and clearly isn't interested in an impartial view. Charles Ditzel ( e-mail, blog), infamous Sun employee and vociferous critic of Eclipse on Mac OS X wrote recently that "The result is that many Eclipse developers have switched to NetBeans and others are beginning the migration to NetBeans by using both IDEs.".įirstly, it's clear to see that Charles' viewpoint is heavily biased towards NetBeans. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |